The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SAIC · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
QMCI · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TTAN | GPN | SAIC | QMCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 60 | 74 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 93 (highest) | 86 | 23 | 78 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 1 | 45 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 29 | 40 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 80 (highest) | 73 | 44 |
| No price data | 14% below value if growth stopped today | 32% above value if growth stopped today | 31% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $6.5B | $19.2B | $5.2B | $13.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |