The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MATX · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TTC | MATX | PNR | FDX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 32 | 70 | 74 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 59 | — | 58 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 40 | 79 | 34 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 53 | 95 (highest) | 78 | 47 |
| Capital allocation | 74 | 100 (highest) | 49 | 78 |
| 111% above value if growth stopped today | 35% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 44% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $9.6B | $7.2B | Not reported | $68.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |