The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TTEC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RDVT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TTEC | TTAN | RDVT | DDD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 63 | 77 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 93 (highest) | — | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 93 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 33 | 44 | 24 | 60 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 78% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 416% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $100.0M | $7.3B | $940.9M | $384.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |