The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PAG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
SBH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | TTEK | PAG | WLDN | SBH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 79 | 59 | 85 (highest) | 43 |
| Pricing power | 20 | 28 | 52 | 85 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 73 | 56 | 24 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 57 | 80 | 100 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 91 | 99 (highest) | 60 | 53 |
| 159% above value if growth stopped today | 16% above value if growth stopped today | 454% above value if growth stopped today | 34% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $8.3B | $14.3B | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |