The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TULP · Agriculture · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TULP | CWBHF | ALCO | LOCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 31 (highest) | 28 | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 20 | 10 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 6 | 56 (highest) | 4 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 6 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 33 | 24 | 96 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | 113% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.2M | $38.3M | $295M | $23.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |