The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CJAX · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TUSK | ACNT | HOFT | CJAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 26 | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 15 | 10 | 54 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 14 | 0 | 24 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 4 | 12 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 59 (highest) | 58 | 24 |
| 157% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1222% above value if growth stopped today | 3956% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $131M | $127M | $137M | $50.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |