The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHIM · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RXO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TWI | OESX | SHIM | RXO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 18 | 19 (highest) | 18 | 18 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 31 | 25 | 20 | 40 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 9 | 36 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 14 (highest) | 11 | — | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 33 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| 34% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 6033% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $432M | $94.4M | $91.2M | $4.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |