The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXT · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HII · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
SIG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | TXT | HII | SIG | RTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 84 | 76 | 23 | 92 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 24 | 66 | 62 | 81 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 64 | 79 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | 39 | 100 (highest) | 69 |
| Capital discipline | 57 | 60 (highest) | 40 | 56 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 2% above high estimate | 68% above high estimate | 17% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $16.7B | $11.3B | $3.7B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |