The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
XZO · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TYL | XZO | ISSC | OSIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 | 75 (highest) | 75 (highest) | 74 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 95 |
| Pricing power | 78 | 38 | 85 (highest) | 61 |
| Returns on capital | 34 | — | 49 (highest) | 38 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 67 | 81 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 60 | 72 | 96 (highest) |
| 282% above value if growth stopped today | 176% above value if growth stopped today | 376% above value if growth stopped today | 135% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $12.8B | $1.4B | $340M | $3.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |