The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GUER · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UMAC | GUER | FOUR | SITM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | — | 93 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 41 | 97 (highest) | 37 | 76 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 80 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $731M | $29.7M | Not reported | $14.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |