The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UNIT · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LBRDA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RDCT · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UNIT | TMGI | LBRDA | RDCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 50 | 75 | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | 70 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 42 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 48 (highest) | 24 |
| 26% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 47% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $2498 | $5.1B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 |