The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UPB · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LEEEF · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UPB | LEEEF | ATPC | CODX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 70 (highest) | 20 | 47 |
| Pricing power | — | 46 | 70 | 74 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 0 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 43 | 24 | 64 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $378.6M | $55.2M | $2.6M | $73 |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |