The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | URBN | LRN | CHH | ULS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 77 (highest) | 77 (highest) | 77 (highest) | 76 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 91 | 100 (highest) | 95 | 72 |
| Pricing power | 50 | 60 | — | 82 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 80 | 48 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 12 | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 89 | 77 | 100 (highest) | 49 |
| 127% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 48% above value if growth stopped today | 336% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $7.8B | $3.5B | $4.9B | $15.0B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |