The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UTI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UTI | FC | BLDR | JACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 49 | 15 | 38 |
| Pricing power | — | 97 (highest) | 39 | 76 |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 38 | 79 | 92 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 87 (highest) | 48 | 57 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 | 82 (highest) | 64 |
| 616% above value if growth stopped today | 3% below value if growth stopped today | 55% below value if growth stopped today | 80% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.1B | $250M | $8.1B | $275M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |