The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YHC · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ISPR · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GWLL · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UTZ | YHC | ISPR | GWLL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 | 26 (highest) | 25 | 24 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 50 (highest) | 29 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 43 | 0 | 20 | 48 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 6 (highest) | 0 | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 28 (highest) | — | 24 | — |
| 14040% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $40.8M | $83M | $59.4M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |