The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

VERI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VTIX · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GUER · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureVERIAIVTIXGUER
Moat Score (0–100)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend203570 (highest)
Pricing power9177097 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$96.3MNot reported$60.8M$29.7M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2026FY2025