The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VICR | GTLL | PLTK | AEIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 71 (highest) | 63 | 33 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 70 | 100 (highest) | 50 |
| Returns on capital | 35 | — | 100 (highest) | 87 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 28 | 75 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 61 (highest) | 53 |
| No price data | No price data | 65% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 597% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $1.4B | $11.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |