The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TRSO · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AISP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VPG | TRSO | FORM | AISP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 28 | 60 (highest) | 31 | 48 |
| Pricing power | 67 | 70 | 59 | 73 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 29 (highest) | — | 16 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 68 | 28 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 59 (highest) | 44 | 45 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 1102% above value if growth stopped today | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $384989 | $9.3B | $72.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |