The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LUCK · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
PRSU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | VSAT | FUBO | LUCK | PRSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 56 | 44 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 70 | 23 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 11 | 28 | 40 (highest) | — |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 58 (highest) | 0 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 493% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.4B | $2.8B | $702M | $1.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2025 |