The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

WAST · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SLE · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DJT · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RBBN · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureWASTSLEDJTRBBN
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend304365 (highest)
Pricing power89 (highest)557781
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2855 (highest)280
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$1.2M$3M$2.4B$353M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025