The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WDAY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KRFG · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WDAY | MBLY | KRFG | DTST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 51 | 55 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 74 (highest) | 45 | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 4 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 44 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 274% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $2.5M | $21.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |