The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

WERN · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GDC · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

REZI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

IIIN · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureWERNGDCREZIIIIN
Moat Score (0–100)3839 (highest)39 (highest)38
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend332048 (highest)35
Pricing power—70 (highest)470
Returns on capital53 (highest)436—
Balance-sheet safety28551873 (highest)
Capital allocation40444446 (highest)
57% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data6% above value if growth stopped todayAround the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$2.0B$67.1M$2.5B$576M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025