The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GWLL · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WEST | UTZ | GWLL | SRXH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 23 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 45 | 20 | 10 |
| Pricing power | 20 | 43 | 48 (highest) | 35 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 28 | — | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 13823% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $736M | $1.2B | $89.1M | $44.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |