The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GPC · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WEYS | SCIA | GPC | HLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 61 (highest) | 53 | 23 |
| Pricing power | 66 | 27 | 56 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 38 | 93 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | — | 18 |
| Capital allocation | 72 (highest) | 24 | 35 | 59 |
| 10% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 67% above value if growth stopped today | 59% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $364M | Not reported | $17.1B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |