The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BTBD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WGO | BTBD | PK | XHR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 29 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 37 | 60 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 17 | — | — | 26 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 64 (highest) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 39 | 44 | 58 (highest) | 46 |
| No price data | No price data | 168% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 831% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $6.9M | $2.9B | $2.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |