The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WHG · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ICE · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RPC · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WHG | ICE | RPC | DOMH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 | 48 (highest) | 46 | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 62 | 95 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | — | — | 30 |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 18 (highest) | 10 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 25 | 4 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 18 | 85 (highest) | 74 | 44 |
| No price data | 91% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $82.7B | Not reported | $42.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |