The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BBW · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TSCO · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | WING | BBW | EAT | TSCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) | 85 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 89 | 90 | 79 |
| Pricing power | 99 | 77 | 100 (highest) | 61 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 78 | 66 | 89 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 88 | 100 (highest) | 76 | 96 |
| 378% above value if growth stopped today | 25% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 382% above value if growth stopped today | 34% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.7B | $432M | $8.3B | $16.3B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |