The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GURE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WLK | CODI | HUN | GURE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 44 (highest) | 10 | — |
| Pricing power | 5 | 58 (highest) | 19 | 49 |
| Returns on capital | 20 | 0 | 33 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 46 | 24 | 64 (highest) | 24 |
| 20% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 33% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $9.4B | $755M | $2.2B | $36.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |