The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OSK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | WMT | HD | ELA | OSK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 86 | 55 | 90 (highest) | 87 |
| Pricing power | 44 | 59 (highest) | 28 | 26 |
| Returns on capital | 75 | 100 (highest) | 93 | 65 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 72 | 41 | 73 (highest) | 63 |
| Capital allocation | 57 | 79 | 51 | 93 (highest) |
| No price data | 78% above value if growth stopped today | 190% above value if growth stopped today | 38% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $298.8B | $324M | $9.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |