The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OFAL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | XOS | ECXJ | OFAL | LE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 20 | — | 15 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 70 (highest) | 29 | 68 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 16 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 42 | 44 | 54 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 419% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $23M | $138M | $2.9M | $359M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |