The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ODFL · Industrials · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | XPEL | ODFL | LECO | DCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 81 | 82 (highest) | 81 | 80 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 47 | 89 | 83 |
| Pricing power | 55 | — | 59 | 60 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 64 | 72 |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 80 | 94 (highest) | 87 |
| 118% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 199% above value if growth stopped today | 169% above value if growth stopped today | 136% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $39.4B | $14.3B | $10.2B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |