The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

YBGJ · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ZLAB · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ALUR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SLS · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureYBGJZLABALURSLS
Moat Score (0–100)49 (highest)49 (highest)49 (highest)49 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend3070 (highest)70
Pricing power8797 (highest)9197 (highest)
Returns on capital0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation242444 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$1.8M$29.2B$13.8M$2.1B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025