The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXPO · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YELP | YETI | RL | EXPO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 87 | 89 (highest) | 88 | 87 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 98 (highest) | 61 | 89 | 76 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 85 | 95 | — |
| Returns on capital | 38 | 100 (highest) | 90 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 96 | 64 | 71 |
| 18% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 92% above value if growth stopped today | 195% above value if growth stopped today | 166% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $3.8B | $23.3B | $3.0B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |