The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YHC · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YHC | BOF | TSN | UTZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 26 | 24 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 63 (highest) | 47 | 45 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 34 (highest) | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 13 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | — | 44 (highest) | 37 | 28 |
| No price data | No price data | 56% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 13927% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $31M | $51M | $18.3B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |