The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YORW · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SO · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ES · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YORW | SO | OGE | ES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 33 (highest) | 32 | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 76 | 91 (highest) | 24 | 85 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 86 | — |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 (highest) | 1 | 2 (highest) | 1 |
| Capital allocation | 39 | 39 | 44 (highest) | 41 |
| 112% above value if growth stopped today | 117% above value if growth stopped today | 79% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 86% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $472M | $95.7B | $9.4B | $25.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |