The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
YUMC · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
CSV · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | YUMC | CSV | FSS | GOLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 71 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 80 | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| Pricing power | 31 | 51 | 43 | 84 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 89 | 90 (highest) | 56 | 50 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 58 | 84 | 65 |
| Capital allocation | 68 | 80 (highest) | 76 | 78 |
| 44% above value if growth stopped today | 9% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 233% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $14.6B | $480M | $6.9B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |