The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RDVT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HNIT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | YYAI | RDVT | PUBM | HNIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 | 55 (highest) | 54 | 54 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 90 (highest) | 46 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 59 | — | 96 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 4 | 30 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 42 |
| No price data | 373% above value if growth stopped today | 98% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $165M | $861M | $589M | $445M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |