The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ZBH · Healthcare · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

SI · Healthcare · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CARL · Healthcare · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BIIB · Healthcare · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureZBHSICARLBIIB
Moat Score (0–100)67 (highest)67 (highest)67 (highest)67 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend75 (highest)707032
Pricing power100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)96
Returns on capital6100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)5555
Capital allocation55 (highest)444440
2% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data39% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$17.9B$421M$287M$29.7B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025