Acadian Asset Management Inc.

AAMI · Other · $3.3B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · Narrow moat ·

Wonderful & reasonably priced

Narrow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

39

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $524M to $564M, increasing; diluted EPS 10.29 to 2.21, decreasing.

Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.

100

Median ROIC 39.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 100% of years.

36

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage 5x.

80

Owner earnings changed +274.8%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations, share count n/a.

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
64% below value if growth stopped today
$828M
$257.66
$257.66
$93.58
64% below value if growth stopped today

A discount this large is often a warning rather than a bargain — the market may expect earnings to keep falling. See the revenue trend above.

How to read this

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings shrinking ~18%/yr over 5 years. The estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 235% above the zero-growth estimate across 49 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Sep 7, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOG, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, RMD, GRMN, PCTY, EAT, UI, SSD, MNST, DOCS, LRCX, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, ROL, CTAS, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, JKHY, TPR, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, LOPE

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

10 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue shrank from $858M (FY2017) to $564M (FY2025) — about −5.1% a year compounded over 8 years.

ROIC is not available for the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 6-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 39.6%. Over the v3 recent window (6 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 39.6%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 100/100.

The balance sheet carried $200M of total debt in FY2025. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 36/100.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2016–FY2025 · 10 fiscal years, normalized from AAMI’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$564M FY2025
$0$500M2016201920222025
Revenue kept after cost of goods

Not disclosed in AAMI’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.

Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICStandard ROIC 49.2% FY2023

Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.

0%50%2016201920222025
Cash an owner could take out$828M FY2021
$0$500M2016201920222025

The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Flagship explainer

How Acadian Asset Management Inc. makes its money

Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s filing does not supply enough comparable lines for a truthful flow chart — here's what is filed:

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of revenueSource
$564M100%
$132M23%
Income before tax$143M25%
Income tax$36.6M6%
$80M14%
Source: · event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026 · annual-row source set

Flagship explainer

What Acadian Asset Management Inc. owns — and owes

Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s filing tags don't support a full breakdown — here's what is filed:

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of assetsSource
Total assets$677M100%
Cash and equivalents$124M18%
$200M30%
Source: · event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026 · annual-row source set

Flagship explainer

What drives Acadian Asset Management Inc.’s return on equity?

One or more filed inputs needed for the five-factor decomposition are unavailable.

DuPont source inputs
InputValueFiscal yearSource
Net income$80MFY2025
Income before tax$143MFY2025
Operating income$132MFY2025
Revenue$564MFY2025
Ending assets$677MFY2025
Beginning assets$703MFY2024
Ending equityUnavailableFY2025
Beginning equityUnavailableFY2024
Source: · event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026 · annual-row source set

Flagship explainer

Where Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s cash went

Acadian Asset Management Inc.’s filing does not supply enough provenance-matched cash-flow lines for a truthful flow chart — here’s what is filed:

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of cash from operationsSource
Cash from operations−$2.4M−100%
Source: · event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026 · annual-row source set

Curated 19-manager tier

Who reported holding Acadian Asset Management Inc.

Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q2—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.

0 holding0 exited0 not holding0/19 resolved19 not retrieved

Named manager positions and quarter-over-quarter changes
ManagerReported positionQuarter-over-quarterFiling accession
Abrams CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Akre CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Baupost GroupNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Berkshire HathawayNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Brave Warrior AdvisorsNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Dodge & CoxNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
First EagleNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
FundsmithNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Gardner Russo & QuinnNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Gates Foundation TrustNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Mairs & PowerNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Markel / Markel-GaynerNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Oakmark / Harris AssociatesNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Pershing SquareNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Polen CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Sequoia / Ruane CunniffNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Southeastern Asset ManagementNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Tweedy, BrowneNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Yacktman Asset ManagementNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved

Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.

Source: Filing source not retrieved · event Jun 30, 2026 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026

Flagship explainer

What Acadian Asset Management Inc. insiders reported

We could not retrieve insider activity for this rendering; no zero-activity claim is shown.

Unavailable: Form 4 activity could not be retrieved for this rendering.

Moat Score history

18 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale63.7 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Sep 7, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for AAMI.

Track record

How Acadian Asset Management Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 20192025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored AAMI on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score100200Indexed price · log scale (2015 = 100)20192021202320252026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the 3 years AAMI rated Wide-moat (2020, 2021 and 2022), the median forward total return that followed — measured only after each year’s filings were public — was:

  • 1 year −8% vs the S&P 500’s 24% (price basis) · median over 3 years
  • 3 years 2% vs the S&P 500’s 28% (price basis) · median over 3 years
  • 5 years 154% vs the S&P 500’s 85% (price basis) · median over 1 year

These are medians computed from the data, not a claim about any one year. The company figures are total returns (dividends reinvested); the S&P 500 is the price-only ^GSPC index, which excludes dividends and so understates the index — the gap flatters the company. A quality rating is not a return forecast, and past returns don’t predict future ones. Educational only, not investment advice.

Other context

#20 of 99 scored Other companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #18BLK BlackRock, Inc.66.3 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  2. #19VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.64.6 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  3. #21UROY URANIUM ROYALTY CORP.63.1 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  4. #22OPY OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.62.8 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat

Compare AAMI with its nearest peersAll Other companies on the Index →

Common questions about AAMI

Does Acadian Asset Management Inc. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) 63.7 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 39, pricing power not measurable from the filings, returns on capital 100, balance-sheet safety 36, capital allocation 80.
Is AAMI trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $257.66 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $93.58, that is 64% below value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has AAMI's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 18 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 63.7 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.