Banzai International, Inc.
PARA · Technology · $10.5M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · Narrow moat ·
On the watchlist
The five investor questions
2022–2025 (latest 4 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $5.3M to $12.2M, increasing; diluted EPS -7.20 to -5.95, increasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.
Median gross margin 68.5% over 4y, stable.
Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.
Net cash position — no leverage risk.
Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations, share count n/a.
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
- Not reported
- Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
- Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
- $1.00
- No price data
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 238% above the zero-growth estimate across 49 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Score records captured Sep 4, 2026.
Exactly which 50 companies?
FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOG, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, RMD, GRMN, PCTY, EAT, UI, SSD, MNST, DOCS, LRCX, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, ROL, CTAS, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, JKHY, TPR, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, LOPE
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
6 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
Banzai International, Inc. booked $12.2M of revenue in FY2025 in the Technology sector and kept 82.0% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −184.9% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
PARA's latest filed year, FY2025, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.
The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Visual explainers
The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.
Moat Score history
Score history begins Sep 4, 2026 — the record builds forward from here.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
None yet — PARA has read Narrow moat for every logged capture since Sep 4, 2026.
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for PARA.
Technology context
#178 of 749 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #176P Everpure, Inc.62.2 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #177ESMR E-SMART CORP.62.2 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #179JOCM JOCOM HOLDINGS CORP.61.6 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #180MU Micron Technology, Inc.61.5 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
Compare PARA with its nearest peers →All Technology companies on the Index →
Common questions about PARA
- Does Banzai International, Inc. have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Banzai International, Inc. (PARA) 61.6 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 57, pricing power 91, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 55, capital allocation 44.
- How has PARA's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 1 reading since Sep 4, 2026; the latest reads 61.6 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.