LONGEVITY HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.

XAGE · Materials · $400891 mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Shallow moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

Shallow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

Revenue & EPS trend70

2024–2025: revenue 50318.00 to 1912811.00, increasing; diluted EPS -14.56 to -4.83, increasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%. Two-year history is scoreable but carries less confidence than a full-cycle record.

Pricing power71

Median gross margin 72.3% over 2y, variable.

Returns on capital

Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.

Balance-sheet safety28

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage -390x.

Capital discipline44

Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

Price vs. owner-earnings value range

Above estimateBelow estimate
No price data
Owner earnings (normalized)
Value range / share
Conservative high estimate / share
Recent price
$0.23
Price vs. high estimate
No price data

Conservative range under moat-index@2.0.0: low end 11.1×, high end capped at 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

5 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

LONGEVITY HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC. booked $1.9M of revenue in FY2025 in the Materials sector and kept 57.2% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −361.0% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

XAGE's filings don't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2021–FY2025 · 5 fiscal years, normalized from XAGE’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$1.9M FY2025
$0$1M$2M202120232025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods57.2% FY2025
0%50%202120232025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed−21.5% FY2023
−20%−10%0%202120232025
Owner earningsCash an owner could take out−$6.8M FY2025
−$10M$0202120232025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in XAGE’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

8 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale53.0 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Jul 21, 2026

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How LONGEVITY HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20212025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored XAGE on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score100Indexed price · log scale 20212022202320242025

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, XAGE did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Materials context

#84 of 304 scored Materials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #82AR ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION53.3 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  2. #83ATR AptarGroup, Inc53.2 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  3. #85CHRD Chord Energy Corp52.7 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  4. #86AMR ALPHA METALLURGICAL RESOURCES, INC.52.4 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat

Compare XAGE with its nearest peersAll Materials companies on the Index →

Common questions about XAGE

Does LONGEVITY HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores LONGEVITY HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC. (XAGE) 53.0 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 70, pricing power 71, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 28, capital discipline 44.
How has XAGE's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 8 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 53.0 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (A methodology upgrade on Jul 20, 2026 re-based the score; readings across engine versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.