EchoStar Corporation

ECHO · Communications · $25.3B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · No moat ·

Price verdict withheld — owner-earnings floor unreliable

No moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

Revenue & EPS trend10

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $19.8B to $15.0B, decreasing; diluted EPS 7.94 to -50.41, decreasing.

Pricing power100

Median gross margin 87.4% over 2y, very stable.

Returns on capital4

Median ROIC 0.9%, above the 12% hurdle in 10% of years.

Balance-sheet safety28

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage 0x.

Capital discipline44

Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.

Price vs. conservative owner-earnings floor

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above owner-earnings floorBelow owner-earnings floor
756% above owner-earnings floor
Owner earnings (normalized)
$266M
Owner-earnings floor / share
$10.27
Capped-growth comparison / share
$10.27
Recent price
$87.88
Price vs. owner-earnings floor
756% above owner-earnings floor

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~54%/yr over 5 years. The floor assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year floor equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This floor assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. ECHO revenue fell in each of the three most recent year-over-year FY comparisons, so this floor is flagged as unreliable for this company.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the floor across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or floor: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth floor 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

19 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $2.2B (FY2008) to $15.0B (FY2025) — about 12.1% a year compounded over 17 years.

It earned −46.9% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 18-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 1.5%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 0.9%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 4/100.

The balance sheet carried $26.0B of total debt in FY2025. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 28/100.

Put together: Pricing Power is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (4/100), which is how ECHO lands at 37/100 — a None moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2007–FY2025 · 19 fiscal years, normalized from ECHO’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$15.0B FY2025
$0$10B$20B2007201320192025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods86.1% FY2017
0%50%2007201320192025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed−46.9% FY2025
−50%0%50%2007201320192025
Owner earningsCash an owner could take out−$13.9B FY2025
−$10B$02007201320192025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in ECHO’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale37.0 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How EchoStar Corporation’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored ECHO on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score100Indexed price · log scale 201120142017202020232025

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, ECHO did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Communications context

#63 of 134 scored Communications companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #61RDCT VNUE, Inc.37.3 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #62SEG Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.37.1 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #64GMBL ESPORTS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.36.9 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #65SHEN Shenandoah Telecommunications Company36.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat

Compare ECHO with its nearest peersAll Communications companies on the Index →

Common questions about ECHO

Does EchoStar Corporation have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores EchoStar Corporation (ECHO) 37.0 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 10, pricing power 100, returns on capital 4, balance-sheet safety 28, capital discipline 44.
Is ECHO trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The conservative owner-earnings floor is $10.27 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $87.88, that is 756% above owner-earnings floor. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the floor is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has ECHO's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 37.0 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.