KINDER MORGAN, INC.

KMI · Utilities · $73.1B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Narrow moat ·

On the watchlist

Narrow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

Revenue & EPS trend67

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $16.2B to $15.2B, decreasing; diluted EPS 0.78 to 1.37, increasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.

Pricing power88

Median gross margin 68.3% over 7y, stable.

Returns on capital22

Median ROIC 9.2%, above the 12% hurdle in 10% of years.

Balance-sheet safety100

Net cash position — no leverage risk.

Capital discipline80

Owner earnings +17.6%/yr, share count flat.

Price vs. conservative owner-earnings floor

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above owner-earnings floorBelow owner-earnings floor
149% above owner-earnings floor
Owner earnings (normalized)
$2.6B
Owner-earnings floor / share
$13.17
Capped-growth comparison / share
$13.17
Recent price
$32.86
Price vs. owner-earnings floor
149% above owner-earnings floor

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~20%/yr over 5 years. The floor assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year floor equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This floor assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Cohort context: median current price is 239% above the floor across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or floor: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth floor 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

17 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $7.2B (FY2009) to $15.2B (FY2025) — about 4.8% a year compounded over 16 years.

It earned 12.0% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 16-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 10.3%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 9.2%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 22/100.

KMI's latest filed year, FY2025, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.

Put together: Balance-Sheet Safety is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (22/100), which is how KMI lands at 71/100 — a Narrow moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2009–FY2025 · 17 fiscal years, normalized from KMI’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$15.2B FY2025
$0$10B2009201520212025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods48.9% FY2022
0%50%2009201520212025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed12.0% FY2025
0%10%20%2009201520212025
Owner earningsCash an owner could take out$3.1B FY2025
$0$2B2009201520212025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in KMI’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale71.4 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How KINDER MORGAN, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored KMI on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score52178Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, KMI did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Utilities context

#2 of 101 scored Utilities companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #1RSG REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.76.4 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  2. #3WM Waste Management, Inc70.2 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  3. #4CWCO CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.68.8 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat

Compare KMI with its nearest peersAll Utilities companies on the Index →

Common questions about KMI

Does KINDER MORGAN, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores KINDER MORGAN, INC. (KMI) 71.4 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 67, pricing power 88, returns on capital 22, balance-sheet safety 100, capital discipline 80.
Is KMI trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The conservative owner-earnings floor is $13.17 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $32.86, that is 149% above owner-earnings floor. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the floor is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has KMI's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 71.4 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.