The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ACBM · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SBGI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ACBM | SBGI | SIDU | GLTK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 16 | 17 (highest) | 17 (highest) | 15 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 15 | 13 | 20 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 1 (highest) | — | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 19 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | — | 36 | 44 (highest) | 28 |
| No price data | 13% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.6M | $932M | Not reported | $256M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |