The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ADM · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FLO · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ADM | SENEA | FLO | RMCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 21 | 22 (highest) | 21 | 21 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 34 | 50 (highest) | 27 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 0 | — | 17 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 10 | 17 (highest) | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 24 | 19 | 1 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 50 (highest) | 45 | 17 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 37% above high estimate | 87% above high estimate | 29% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $41.3B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $8.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |