The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ADNT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ADNT | RIVN | AIHS | ARMK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 70 | 15 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 6 | 0 | 7 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 8 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 4 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 28 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 73% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 382% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.6B | $19.6B | $6.1M | $15.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |