The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AGCO | INSW | ROP | SNDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 31 | 65 | 89 (highest) | 31 |
| Pricing power | 36 | — | 97 | 98 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 29 | 14 | 5 | 54 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 76 (highest) | 58 | 28 | 58 |
| Capital allocation | 97 (highest) | 80 | 51 | 28 |
| 11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 6% above value if growth stopped today | 129% above value if growth stopped today | 150% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.8B | $4.6B | $39.2B | $6.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |