The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AKA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
ONEW · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FLY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AKA | ONEW | FLY | WYGC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | — | 60 (highest) | 56 |
| Pricing power | 92 (highest) | 35 | 7 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 58 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 43 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $118M | Not reported | $3.1B | $13.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |