The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALGT · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALGT | RJET | RUN | AZZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 48 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 95 (highest) | 70 | 90 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 86 (highest) | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 80 (highest) | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 13 | 28 | 43 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 26 | 80 (highest) | 60 | 60 |
| No price data | 2% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 243% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $733M | $1.7B | $3.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |