The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ULH · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALK | ARTW | GFF | ULH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 61 (highest) | 40 | 24 |
| Pricing power | — | 18 | 34 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 0 | 8 | 27 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 23 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 33 | 38 | 56 | 59 (highest) |
| 104% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 387% above value if growth stopped today | 63% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $5.3B | Not reported | $4.2B | $415M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |